Sunday, June 21, 2009 to Friday, June 26, 2009
Instructors: Lucas Morel and Peter C. Myers
Course Focus:
This course will explore the history of black Americans as they strove to secure their dignity as human beings, and rights as American citizens, in the face of racial prejudice. It will examine the diverse viewpoints of leading black intellectuals and activists on human equality, slavery, self-government, the rule of law, emancipation, colonization, and citizenship. Contemporary issues to be considered will include affirmative action and current debates over race essentialism and identity politics.
Specific documents, issues, and controversies to be considered include the Declaration of Independence, the U.S. Constitution, reconstruction, black codes, Jim Crow laws, and segregation. Students will also review laws, constitutional amendments, court cases, and social criticism addressing civil and political rights in America. Important writings to be examined will include Martin Delany's "Condition, Elevation, Emigration, and Destiny of the Colored People of the United States" (1852), Frederick Douglass's "Meaning of July Fourth for the Negro" (1852), Booker T. Washington's "Atlanta Exposition Address" (1895), W.E.B. Du Bois's Souls of Black Folk (1903), Marcus Garvey's Negro World articles (1922-24), Martin Luther King's "I Have a Dream" speech and "Letter from Birmingham Jail" (1963), and Malcolm X's "Message to the Grassroots" (1964). Students will also read a history of the fight for equal rights in America and related scholarly commentary.
Learning Objectives:
After completing this course, students will be able to compare and contrast the arguments of important black thinkers and activists in American history. They will be able to weigh the respective merits and drawbacks of contemporary proposals to secure the equal protection of civil rights for black Americans. Students will also be able to locate various black thinkers in the historical and political development of the United States and be able to argue for and against specific approaches to eliminating racial prejudice from the public sphere.
Requirements:
Students auditing the course as a part of a Teaching American History Grant program must complete all readings, attend all of the seminars, and fully participate during the week.
Required Texts:
Recommended Texts:
For Further Reading:
Note: In the event students would like to pursue a particular topic further, the syllabus lists additional resources to consult under "Supplemental/Optional Readings." They are not provided in the course pack, but may be included in the required texts.
Sunday, June 21
4:30 - 6:00 pm: Session 1 with Professors Morel and Myers
Topics: Introduction to seminar; the Founders on Freedom and Slavery
Focus: What did the Founders mean in declaring "all men are created equal"? Given the existence of slavery in Revolutionary America, did they really only mean to say that all "white English Protestant Christian males who own property" are created equal? If, on the other hand, the Founders meant the term "men" to be inclusive of all human beingsblack and white, male and femalethen how are we to understand the relation between their universal principles (which would condemn slavery) and their actual practice (the fact that slavery continued to exist in America until the Civil War)? How does the requirement of consent as the only legitimate basis of government qualify the pursuit of equality in a free society? How are we to regard the handling of slavery in the Constitution? Nowhere is there an explicit reference to slavery in the original document and yet there are clauses that were understood to have reference to slavery and to make some accommodation to it. Are those accommodations morally defensible or not?
Readings:
Supplemental/Optional Readings:
7:30 pm - 9:00 pm: Session 2 Institute Lecture
Monday, June 22
9:00 am - 10:30 am: Session 3 with Professor Morel
Topic: Emigrationists
Focus: Even while slavery continued, free blacks in America began to reflect on what the best course of action would be after emancipation. The first choice to be made was: do we stay or do we go? Often basing themselves on the historical example of the Israelites, a number of prominent figures argued for a mass emigration, either back to Africa or to other lands in the New World. We will examine the emigrationists' grim assessment of the prospects for racial equality and racial comity in the United States. As a thought experiment, consider how you would have felt at the time. Would you have favored staying or going? Would a black Exodus have been preferable? Would it have been better or worse for blacks, better or worse for whites, better or worse for America? Is the argument for emigration offensive to you? Would it be more offensive if it were proposed today as the solution for our continuing racial troubles? Is emigration a cowardly solution? A racist one? Or is the idea of emigration realistic, bold, and prophetic?
Readings:
10:50 am - 12:20 pm: Session 4 with Professor Myers
Topic: Frederick Douglass
Focus: How did Douglass answer the question, "What Country Have I?" What was the basis for his affirmation of an American identity for African Americans? What does his stress on self-elevation indicate about his understanding of freedom? How did he conceive of the relation between self-help and abolition? Why did he think there were solid grounds for hopefulness, in the face of the Dred Scott ruling and other apparent setbacks for the abolitionist cause during the 1850s? What moved him to change his opinion on the U.S. Constitution's relation to slavery, and how did this change of opinion contribute to his hopefulness concerning abolition? How did it contribute to his critical opinion of Abraham Lincoln during the early years of the war?
Readings:
On America:
On Self-Help, Abolition, and Hopefulness:
Supplemental/Optional Readings:
4:00 pm - 5:30 pm: Session 5 with Professor Myers
Topic: Frederick Douglass (continued)
Focus: Just as Douglass was the leading figure in the fight to secure the natural right to liberty for blacks in America, he was the leading figure in the post-war struggle to secure civil rights for African-Americans. Why does Douglass favor justice ("fair play") over charity ("benevolence") for black Americans? What sorts of efforts at self-elevation does he recommend to African Americans in the post-Emancipation era? How does his enlarged view of Lincoln contribute to his appeals both for justice and for self-elevation? How does he conceive of the long-term future of "the colored race" in America and of America's deepest national mission? What principles inform Douglass's vision of a composite American nationality? How does this vision in turn support a strong, heartfelt affirmation of American identity among African Americans? How does it cohere with his longstanding rejection of emigration and his disapproval of "race pride" among African Americans?
Readings:
On Justice and Charity for African Americans:
On Lincoln, Justice, and Self-Elevation
On the Future of African Americans in America
Supplemental/Optional Readings:
Tuesday, June 23
9:00 am - 10:30 am: Session 6 with Professor Morel
Topic: Booker T. Washington
Focus: Washington came into public prominence as a result of a speech he delivered at the Atlanta Exposition in 1895. This speech articulated a strategy of racial reconciliation and accommodation that became known as the Atlanta Compromise. On what issues was Washington prepared to compromise and why? How did his position differ from that of Frederick Douglass (particularly with respect to the 15th Amendment)? What understanding of human nature informed Washington's policy of gradualism? Washington always made clear that he believed African-Americans had a high destiny in America and a particular contribution to make to the life of the nation. What were the essential features of that destiny?
Readings:
Supplemental/Optional Readings:
10:50 am - 12:20 pm: Session 7 with Professor Myers
Topic: W.E.B. Du Bois
Focus: Why does Du Bois seek to "conserve" the races? How would "the conservation of the races" help the future of the Negro race as well as the future of world civilization? How can the United States help blacks fulfill their destiny? What principles of the American republic appear to run counter to Du Bois's emphasis on "race organizations" and "race solidarity"? To eliminate color prejudice, what does Du Bois recommend as the respective duties of blacks and whites in America? What does Du Bois mean by "double consciousness," and is this an accurate rendering of the acculturation of blacks in America? Aside from the American "color line," to what internal source does Du Bois point as a significant obstacle to black achievement? What is the role of "agitation" in securing equal rights under the law?
Readings:
Supplemental/Optional Readings:
4:00 pm - 5:30 pm: Session 8 with Professor Morel
Topic: W.E.B. Du Bois (continued)
Focus: Early in his career, Du Bois delivered a critique of Booker T. Washington's leadership. What were the essential points of disagreement between them? Du Bois is known as one of the great defenders of the need for higher education, particularly for the "talented tenth." What does he understand the purposes of liberal education to be? Is his understanding of liberal education compatible with his call for "the conservation of races" and the preservation of racial and cultural distinctness?
Readings:
Supplemental/Optional Readings:
Wednesday, June 24
9:00 am - 10:30 am: Session 9 with Professor Morel
Topic: Marcus Garvey; Attacking Segregation in the Courts (Brown v. Board of Education)
Focus: Why does Garvey respond to color prejudice in America more pessimistically than Douglass, Washington, or Du Bois? How does the American context after World War I shape Garvey's solutions for the plight of black Americans? Why is a Negro nation so important for progress in the protection of the rights of Negroes anywhere in the world? In Brown v. Board of Education (1954), the Supreme Court briefly traces the history of public schools in America. How does this help the Court argue against racially segregated schools? What role do legal precedents play in the Court's argument against "separate but equal" schools? What is meant by "intangible considerations" and how does this help the Court establish that the mere act of separating school children by race produces an unequal education? What are the strengths and weaknesses of the Court's opinion in Brown? If segregated schools did not produce "a feeling of inferiority" on the part of black children, would these schools be unconstitutional according to Brown?
Readings:
Supplemental/Optional Readings:
10:50 am - 12:20 pm: Session 10 with Professor Myers
Topic: Martin Luther King, Jr.
Focus: Why does King reject force as a response to oppression? What is the major concern of the white clergymen who counsel King to stay away from Birmingham? What are the four stages of civil disobedience? How does King's civil disobedience (or nonviolent resistance) against a particular law actually support obedience to the government and laws? Why does King blame white moderates more than fringe elements like the Ku Klux Klan for lack of progress in securing civil rights for black Americans? What is the role of the church and God in King's leadership of the modern Civil Rights Movement? In his "I Have a Dream" speech, does King combine religion and politics in a way that upholds or subverts what has come to be known as the "wall of separation" between church and state?
Readings:
Supplemental/Optional Readings:
3:30 - 5:30 pm (note early time): Session 11 with Professors Morel and Myers
Activity: Watch Raisin in the Sun
Thursday, June 25
9:00 am - 10:30 am: Session 12 with Professor Morel
Topic: Martin Luther King, Jr. (continued)
Focus: Does King's proposal for a "Bill of Rights for the Disadvantaged" indicate a shift from his earlier vision of the American dream? Does King's advocacy of "compensatory or preferential treatment" look more to race or poverty as its justification? Is the GI Bill of Rights a good analogy for King's promotion of a federal, economic program to help blacks and the disadvantaged, generally? What does "black power" mean to King?
Readings:
Supplemental/Optional Readings:
10:50 am - 12:20 pm: Session 13 with Professor Myers
Topic: Malcolm X
Focus: Malcolm X insists that there is no legitimate intermediate position between "the ballot" and "the bullet." He is highly critical of King's reliance on "civil" disobedience. Is he correct? How does his understanding of political action (and particularly the justification for violence) compare to the right of revolution as articulated in the Declaration of Independence? Why did Malcolm X reject integration as an aim of the civil rights struggle? Why must black nationalism be an internationalist movement?
Readings:
Supplemental/Optional Readings:
4:00 pm - 5:30 pm: Session 14 with Professor Myers
Topic: Black Power and Its Critics
Focus: Carmichael, Hamilton, hooks, and Steele are all centrally concerned with self-respect and the conditions of real agency. Compare and contrast their analyses of what self-respect is, why it is so important, how demeaning stereotypes affect it, and what conditions and actions tend to foster it. What are the points in contention between these thinkers? What are their varying assessments of middle-class America?
Readings:
Supplemental/Optional Readings:
Friday, June 26
9:00 am - 10:30 am: Session 15 with Professor Morel
Topic: Affirmative Action
Focus: In the cases of Grutter and Gratz, which of the Supreme Court's opinions (majority, concurring, or dissenting) made the best argument to uphold or reject the University of Michigan's affirmative action policies? What does it mean to "take affirmative action"? How has affirmative action, in principle and practice, changed from its origins in the early 1960s? How does the argument for "diversity" differ from the argument for affirmative action as a "remedy" for past injury?
Readings:
Supplemental/Optional Readings:
10:50 am - 12:20 pm: Session 16 with Professors Myers
Topic: The Cosby Controversy
Focus: In a now-famous speech to the NAACP in 2004, Bill Cosby declared that the center of the race problem today is no longer white racism but instead a self-destructive cultural ethos among a subclass of African Americans. His speech provoked a torrent of controversy. Is Cosby "blaming the victim," as his detractors contend? Or, as his supporters have it, is he speaking long-suppressed and much-needed truths? What moral and political prescriptions follow from Cosby's analysis?
Readings:
Supplemental/Optional Readings:
1:30 pm - 3:00 pm: Session 17 with Professors Morel and Myers
Activity: Blue Book Final Examination ("long answer" format)
401 College Avenue
Ashland, OH 44805
(419) 289-4142 (800) 882-1548
